nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification

请选择需要下载的pdf数据

正在翻译英文数据 ...
paper paperNew
2015, 05, v.43 445-450
三种内固定方法治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的效果比较
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.16389/j.cnki.cn42-1737/n.2015.05.013
摘要:

目的比较3种内固定物,股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)、动力髋螺钉(DHS)、股骨近端锁定加压钢板(LCP)在治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的效果评价。方法纳入研究对象的122例老年骨折患者中,采用PFNA固定的有43例,采用DHS固定的有32例,采用LCP固定的有47例,通过临床记录及随访统计手术操作时间、术中出血量、术后并发症发生率以及术后髋关节功能恢复情况。结果PFNA手术组在骨折愈合时间及髋关节功能评分上与后两组(DHS、LCP)比较差异无统计学意义,但手术操作时间、术中出血量比较差异有统计学意义。122例患者均无相关并发症。结论PFNA设计合理,固定牢固可靠,是治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的理想内固定器材,其微创操作、出血少的优点,更适合老年骨质疏松患者的骨折治疗。

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA)、dynamic hip screw(DHS)and locking compression plate(LCP)for treatment of intertrochanteric fracturein the elderly patients. Methods 122 patients included in the study with intertrochanteric fracture weretreated with fracture fixation operation,43 cases with PFNA fixation,32 cases with DHS fixation and 47 cases with LCP fixation. The operation time,intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications,postoperative hip joint function were recorded through follow-up and clinical records statistics. Results PFNA group had less operative time and intraoperative blood loss compared with the other two groups(DHS、LCP),There were no significant differences on the healing time and hip function score in thosegroups. There were no complications in all the 122 patients. Conclusion PFNA has the characteristicsof reasonable design and reliable fixation strength. It is the appropriate method of the treatment for femoralof intertrochanteric fracture,especially to those elderly with unstable osteoporosis intertrochantericfractures for its advantages of less bleeding and minimally invasiveness.

参考文献

[1]卢世壁,王继芳,王岩.坎贝尔骨科手术学[M].10版.北京:人民军医出版社,2011:2758.

[2]胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].3版.北京:人民军医出版社,2005:708,711,737.

[3]王亦璁.骨与关节损伤[M].4版.北京:人民军医出版社,2007:1183-1193.

[4]田观明.DHS和PFN治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效观察[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2011,21(5):349-350.

[5]KOVAL K J,CHEN A L,AHARONOFF G B,et al.Clinical pathway for hip fractures in the elderly:the hospital for joint diseases experience[J].Clinical Orthopaedics&Related Research,2004(425):72-81.

[6]ADAMS C I,ROBINSON C M,COURT-BROWN C M,et al.Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intrameduuary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J].J Orthop Traum,2001,15(6):394-400.

[7]徐鸿尧,赵建宁,郭亭.股骨粗隆间骨折DHS内固定术后骨折不愈合的危险因素分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2014(12):1119-1202.

[8]SCHUTZ M,SUDKAMP N P.Revolution in plate osteosynthesis:new internal fixator systems[J].J Orthop Sci,2003,8(5):252-258.

[9]蔡迎峰,陈胜,张维.股骨小粗隆缺损的生物力学评价及临床意义[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2001,16(3):178-179.

[10]罗湘平,何顺清,李治安.锁定钢板与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床对照试验[J].中国骨伤,2011,24(3):242-244.

[11]刘俊.不同内固定治疗方法治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的比较研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2011,21(19):2283-2285.

[12]杨声波,陈文帅,沈伟冰.PFNA与DHS治疗23例老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效对比分析[J].福建医药杂志,2007,29(6):35-37.

基本信息:

DOI:10.16389/j.cnki.cn42-1737/n.2015.05.013

中图分类号:R687.3

引用信息:

[1]童杰,王金华,任国海.三种内固定方法治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的效果比较[J].江汉大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(05):445-450.DOI:10.16389/j.cnki.cn42-1737/n.2015.05.013.

基金信息:

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文