nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification

请选择需要下载的pdf数据

正在翻译英文数据 ...
paper paperNew
2022, 05, v.50 41-49
沿淮地区小麦茎秆抗倒伏能力与基部节间性状的关系
基金项目(Foundation): 安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(1408085QC54); 安徽省高校协同创新项目(GXXT-2021-089)
邮箱(Email): yansh@ahstu.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.16389/j.cnki.cn42-1737/n.2022.05.005
摘要:

为明确影响沿淮地区小麦抗倒伏能力形成的内在因素,选用11个小麦品种,研究其茎秆特征、节间形态学特征、基部二节间力学特征、化学成分和解剖结构,分析小麦茎秆抗倒能力与相关性状间的关系。结果 表明:株高较低、重心高度下降、茎秆基部二节间大维管束数目较多、薄壁组织较厚的小麦品种抗倒伏指数较高。小麦茎秆基部二节间解剖结构结果 发现,荃麦725和华成3366的维管束数目较多、薄壁组织较厚、细胞层数较多、细胞排列较为紧密、抗倒伏指数较高。相关分析表明,小麦抗倒伏指数与株高呈显著负相关,与重心高度呈极显著负相关,与茎秆基部二节间大维管束数目呈显著正相关,与薄壁组织厚度呈显著正相关。本研究条件下,植株较矮,茎秆重心高度较低,基部二节间细胞排列紧密,大维管束数量较多,薄壁组织厚度较厚,机械强度大,有利于小麦茎秆抗倒能力形成。

Abstract:

To clarify the internal factors affecting wheat lodging resistance formation along Huaihe River,the relationship between wheat stem lodging resistance and related traits was discussed based on analyzing, the stem characteristics,internode morphological characteristics,basal two-internode mechanical characteristics, chemical composition, and anatomical structure of the selected 11 wheat varieties. The results showed that the wheat varieties with lower plant height, lower barycenter height, larger vascular bundles between the two internodes at the stem base,and thicker parenchyma had a higher lodging resistance index.Based on the anatomical structure of the stem between the second internode of the wheat base,QM725 and HC3366 had more vascular bundles,thicker parenchyma,more cell layers,more closely arranged cells,and higher lodging resistance index. In correlation analysis,the lodging resistance index of wheat was significantly negatively correlated with plant height, extremely significantly negatively correlated with barycenter height,significantly positively correlated with the number of large vascular bundles in the second internode of stem base,and positively correlated with the thickness of parenchyma. Under the conditions of this study,the plant is shorter,the stem barycenter height is lower,the cells are arranged closely between the two basal internodes,the number of large vascular bundles is more,the thickness of thin wall tissue is thicker,and the mechanical strength is large,which is beneficial to the formation of lodging resistance of wheat stem.

参考文献

[1]卢燕宇,孙维,唐为安,等.气候变化背景下安徽省冬小麦气候生产潜力和胁迫风险研究[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(1):17-30.

[2]陈金华,余卫国,刘瑞娜,等.日尺度标准化前期降水蒸散指数及其在安徽省的适用性分析[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2019,27(6):919-928.

[3] TRIPATHI S C,SAYRE K D,KAUL J N,et al. Growth and morphology of spring wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)culms and their association with lodging:effects of genotypes,N levels and ethephon[J]. Field Crops Research,2003,84(3):271-290.

[4]杜祥备,孔令聪,习敏,等.江淮区域稻麦两熟制周年资源分配、利用特征[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2019,27(7):1078-1087.

[5]李嘉豪,刘昊东,王伟伟,等.中国小麦主推品种和育成品系的抗倒伏性评价[J].植物遗传资源学报,2021,22(1):50-56.

[6]陈磊.安徽省小麦干热风、高温逼熟、贪青晚熟、雪灾、倒伏灾害的防御[J].农业灾害研究,2014,4(10):53-57.

[7]蒲定福,周俊儒,李邦发,等.根倒伏小麦抗倒性评价方法研究[J].西北农业学报,2000(1):58-61.

[8]魏鹏,邵庆勤,闫素辉.不同抗倒类型小麦植株节间性状与抗倒能力的氮肥调控效应[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,47(6):622-629.

[9] KONG E,LIU D C,GUO X L,et al. Anatomical and chemical characteristics associated with lodging resistance in wheat[J]. The Crop Journal,2013,1(1):43-49.

[10] TURNER S R,SOMERVILLE C R. Collapsed xylem phenotype of arabidopsis identifies mutants deficient in cellulose deposition in the secondary cell wall[J]. The Plant Cell,1997,9(5):689-701.

[11] WANG J,ZHU J M,LIN Q Q,et al. Effects of stem structure and cell wall components on bending strength in wheat[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,2006(7):815-823.

[12]王丹,丁位华,冯素伟,等.不同小麦品种茎秆特性及其与抗倒性的关系[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(5):1496-1502.

[13]朱新开,王祥菊,郭凯泉,等.小麦倒伏的茎秆特征及对产量与品质的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2006(1):87-92.

[14]王芬娥,黄高宝,郭维俊,等.小麦茎秆力学性能与微观结构研究[J].农业机械学报,2009,40(5):92-95.

[15] KELBERT A J,SPANER D,BRIGGS K G,et al. The association of culm anatomy with lodging susceptibility in modern spring wheat genotypes[J]. Euphytica,2004,136(2):211-221.

[16]张红漫,郑荣平,陈敬文,等. NREL法测定木质纤维素原料组分的含量[J].分析试验室,2010,29(11):15-18.

[17]王荣辉,黄玉芬,曾芳,等.连续流动在植株全氮测定中的应用[J].广东农业科学,2012,39(23):57-58,61.

[18]苏亚蕊,孙少光,刘浩婷,等.不同小麦品种(系)抗倒伏性状多样性分析[J].麦类作物学报,2021,41(10):1238-1246.

[19]徐磊,王大伟,时荣盛,等.小麦基部节间茎秆密度与抗倒性关系的研究[J].麦类作物学报,2009,29(4):673-679.

[20]胡昊,李莎莎,华慧,等.不同小麦品种主茎茎秆形态结构特征及其与倒伏的关系[J].麦类作物学报,2017,37(10):1343-1348.

[21]邵云,张黛静,冯荣成,等. 3种化学调控剂对西农979抗倒伏性的影响[J].西北农业学报,2011,20(4):53-57.

[22] ZUBER U,WINZELER H,MESSMER M,et al. Morphological traits associated with lodging resistance of spring wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science,1999,182(1):17-24.

[23]李金才,尹钧,魏凤珍.播种密度对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒指数的影响[J].作物学报,2005(5):662-666.

[24]姚金保,马鸿翔,姚国才,等.小麦抗倒性研究进展[J].植物遗传资源学报,2013,14(2):208-213.

[25]孟令志,买春艳,于立强,等.黄淮冬麦区部分小麦品种(系)抗倒伏相关性状分析[J].麦类作物学报,2016,36(7):888-895.

[26]冯素伟,姜小苓,胡铁柱,等.不同小麦品种茎秆显微结构与抗倒强度关系研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(36):57-62.

基本信息:

DOI:10.16389/j.cnki.cn42-1737/n.2022.05.005

中图分类号:S512.1

引用信息:

[1]张培文,闫素辉,张从宇等.沿淮地区小麦茎秆抗倒伏能力与基部节间性状的关系[J].江汉大学学报(自然科学版),2022,50(05):41-49.DOI:10.16389/j.cnki.cn42-1737/n.2022.05.005.

基金信息:

安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(1408085QC54); 安徽省高校协同创新项目(GXXT-2021-089)

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文